Trends in surgical management of spinal metastases in a Singaporean tertiary referral center: a 17-year retrospective review.

Introduction: Surgical treatment is increasingly the treatment of choice in cancer patients with epidural spinal cord compression and spinal instability. There has also been an evolution in surgical treatment with the advent of minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques and separation surgery. This paper aims to investigate the changes in epidemiology, surgical technique, outcomes and complications in the last 17 years in a tertiary referral center in Singapore. Methods: This is a retrospective study of 383 patients with surgically treated spinal metastases treated between January 2005 to January 2022. Patients were divided into 3 groups, patients treated between 2005 - 2010, 2011-2016, and 2017- 2021. Demographic, oncological, surgical, patient outcome and survival data were collected. Statistical analysis with univariate analysis was performed to compare the groups. Results: There was an increase in surgical treatment (87 vs 105 vs 191). Lung, Breast and prostate cancer were the most common tumor types respectively. There was a significant increase in MIS(p<0.001) and Separation surgery (p<0.001). There was also a significant decrease in mean blood loss (1061ml vs 664 ml vs 594ml) (p<0.001) and total transfusion (562ml vs 349ml vs 239ml) (p<0.001). Group 3 patients were more likely to have improved or normal neurology (p=<0.001) and independent ambulatory status(p=0.012). There was no significant change in overall survival. Conclusion: There has been a significant change in our surgical practice with decreased blood loss, transfusion and improved neurological and functional outcomes. Patients should be managed in a multidisciplinary manner and surgical treatment should be recommended when indicated.

Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score Is Predictive of Perioperative Adverse Events in Operatively Treated Thoracic and Lumbar Fractures.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study of patients with surgically treated thoracolumbar fractures. PURPOSE: This study aimed to describe the incidence of adverse events (AEs) after surgical stabilization of thoracolumbar spine injuries and to identify predictive factors for the occurrence of AEs. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Thoracolumbar spine fractures are frequently present in patients with blunt trauma and are associated with significant morbidity. AEs can occur due to the initial spinal injury or secondary to surgical treatment. There is a lack of emphasis in the literature on the AEs that can occur after operative management of thoracolumbar fractures. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 199 patients with surgically treated thoracolumbar fractures operated between January 2007 and January 2018. The potential risk factors for the development of AEs as well as the development of common complications were evaluated by univariate analysis, and a multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors predictive of the above. RESULTS: The overall rate of AEs was 46.7%; 83 patients (41.7%) had nonsurgical AEs, whereas 24 (12.1%) had surgical adverse events. The most common AEs were urinary tract infections in 43 patients (21.6%), and hospital-acquired pneumonia in 21 patients (10.6%). On multivariate logistic regression, a Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity (TLICS) score of 8-10 (odds ratio [OR], 6.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.33-17.51), the presence of polytrauma (OR, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.17-5.99), and undergoing open surgery (OR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.09-4.88) were significant risk factors for AEs. The absence of neurological deficit was associated with a lower rate of AEs (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.31-0.70). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests the presence of polytrauma, preoperative American Spinal Injury Association score, and TLICS score are predictive of AEs in patients with surgically treated thoracolumbar fractures. The results might also suggest a role for minimally invasive surgical methods in reducing AEs in these patients.

Selective Thoracic Fusion for Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Comparison of Three Surgical Techniques with Minimum 5-year Follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN: Single-center retrospective review of outcomes among three surgical techniques in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis (T-AIS) with a follow-up of at least 5 years. OBJECTIVE: To investigate how outcomes compare in video-assisted anterior thoracic instrumentation (VATS), all hooks/hook-pedicle screw hybrid instrumentation (HHF), and all pedicle screw instrumentation (PSF) techniques for T-AIS. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Studies comparing outcomes for anterior versus posterior fusion for T-AIS are few and with short follow-up. METHODS: Three groups of patients with T-AIS who underwent thoracic fusion were included in this study: 98 patients with mean curve of 49.0°â€Š±â€Š9.5° underwent VATS (Group 1); 44 patients with mean curve of 51.1°â€Š±â€Š7.4° underwent HHF (Group 2); and 47 patients with mean curve of 47.6°â€Š±â€Š9.9° underwent PSF (Group 3). Radiological outcomes were compared at preoperative, and up to 5 years. Surgical outcomes were noted until latest follow-up. RESULTS: Group 1 had less blood loss, less fusion levels, longer surgical time, and longer hospital stay compared with the other groups (P < 0.01). Groups 1 and 3 were comparable in all time periods with 78.8% and 78.2% immediate curve correction, and 72.9% and 72.1% at 5 years, respectively. Group 2 had lower correction in all time periods (P < 0.0001). Thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis decreased in Group 3, but improved in both Groups 1 and 2 (P < 0.0001). Group 1 had more respiratory complications. The posterior groups had more deep wound infections. Two patients in Group 1 and one patient in Group 2 required revision surgery for implant-related complications. Reoperations for deep wound infections were noted only in the posterior groups. CONCLUSION: This is the first report comparing 5 year outcomes between anterior and posterior surgery for T-AIS. All three surgical methods resulted in significant and durable scoliosis correction; however, curve correction using HHF was inferior to both VATS and PSF with the latter two groups achieving similar coronal correction. However, VATS involved fewer segments, kyphosis improvement, and no deep wound infection, whereas PSF has less surgical time, shorter hospital stays, and no revision surgery from implant-related complications.Level of Evidence: 3.

Risk factors for surgical complications in the management of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) is a progressive, debilitating disease most commonly affecting the cervical spine. When compared to other degenerative pathologies, OPLL procedures carry a significantly higher risk of complications owing to increased case complexity and technical difficulties. Most previous studies have focused on functional outcomes and few have reported on risk factors for postoperative complications in OPLL patients. PURPOSE: To identify clinical and radiological risk factors of surgical complications following treatment for cervical OPLL STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review PATIENT SAMPLE: One hundred thirty-one patients with cervical myelopathy secondary to OPLL who underwent surgical decompression with complete 2-year follow-up. OUTCOME MEASURES: Surgical and medical postoperative complications were analyzed. Revision surgery rates and mortality rates were recorded. METHODS: Clinical, surgical, and radiological characteristics were collected for each patient. Complications within 30 days were identified. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to identify risk factors for surgical complications. RESULTS: There were 39 (29.8%) surgical complications in the cohort, which included C5 palsy (7.6%), dural tear (3.1%), surgical site infection (3.1%), and epidural hematoma (1.5%). 2-year revision and mortality rates were 4.6% and 2.3%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that blood loss ≥750mL (OR 3.42, p=0.028), operative duration ≥5.5 hours (OR 3.16, p=0.008), hill-type OPLL (OR 3.08, p=0.011), K-line (-) OPLL (OR 5.39, p<0.001), and presence of a double-layer sign (OR 3.79, p=0.002) were significant risk factors. In multivariate analysis, only hill-type OPLL (OR 2.61, p=0.048) and K-line (-) OPLL (OR 2.98, p=0.031) were found to be significant. Patients with both hill-type and K-line (-) OPLL had a 3.5 times risk of developing surgical complications (p=0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with OPLL have a higher risk of perioperative surgical complications if they had a hill-shaped OPLL and K-line (-) OPLL on preoperative imaging studies. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this study is the first to link hill-type and K-line (-) OPLL morphology as risk factors for perioperative surgical complications.

A novel hospital capacity versus clinical justification triage score (CCTS) for prioritization of spinal surgeries in the "new normal state" of the COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: During the Coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak, while healthcare systems and hospitals are diverting their resources to combat the pandemic, patients who require spinal surgeries continue to accumulate. The aim of this study is to describe a novel hospital capacity versus clinical justification triage score (CCTS) to prioritize patients who require surgery during the "new normal state" of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODOLOGY: A consensus study using the Delphi technique was carried out among clinicians from the Orthopaedic Surgery, Neurosurgery, and Anaesthesia departments. Three rounds of consensus were carried out via survey and Webinar discussions. RESULTS: A 50-points score system consisting of 4 domains with 4 subdomains was formed. The CCTS were categorized into the hospital capacity, patient factors, disease severity, and surgery complexity domains. A score between 30 and 50 points indicated that the proposed operation should proceed without delay. A score of less than 20 indicates that the proposed operation should be postponed. A score between 20 and 29 indicates that the surgery falls within a grey area where further discussion should be undertaken to make a joint justification for approval of surgery. CONCLUSION: This study is a proof of concept for the novel CCTS scoring system to prioritize surgeries to meet the rapidly changing demands of the COVID-19 pandemic. It offers a simple and objective method to stratify patients who require surgery and allows these complex and difficult decisions to be unbiased and made transparently among surgeons and hospital administrators.

Symptomatic Construct Failure after Metastatic Spine Tumor Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence and presentation of symptomatic failures (SFs) after metastatic spine tumor surgery (MSTS). To identify the associated risk factors. To categorize SFs based on the management in these patients. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Few studies have reported on the incidence (1.9%-16%) and risk factors of SF after MSTS. It is unclear whether all SFs, occurring in MSTS-patients, result in revision surgery. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis on 288 patients (246 for final analysis) who underwent MSTS between 2005-2015. Data collected were demographics and peri/postoperative clinical and radiological features. Early and late radiological SF were defined as presentation before and after 3 months from index surgery, respectively. Univariate and multivariate models of competing risk regression analysis were designed to determine the risk factors for SF with death as a competing event. RESULTS: We observed 14 SFs (5.7%) in 246 patients; 10 (4.1%) underwent revision surgery. Median survival was 13.4 months. The mean age was 58.8 years (range, 21-87 years); 48.4% were women. The median time to failure was 5 months (range, 1-60 months). Patients with SF were categorized into three groups: (1) SF when the primary implant was revised (n=5, 35.7%); (2) peri-construct progression of disease requiring extension (n=5, 35.7%); and (3) SFs that did not warrant revision (n=4, 28.5%). Four patients (28.5%) presented with early failure. SF commonly occurred at the implant-bone interface (9/14) and all patients had a spinal instability neoplastic score (SINS) >7. Thirteen patients (92.8%) who developed failure had fixation spanning junctional regions. Multivariate competing risk regression showed that preoperative Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score was a significant risk factor for implant failure (adjusted sub-hazard ratio, 7.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.63-30.07; p<0.0009). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of SF (5.7%) was low in patients undergoing MSTS although these patients did not undergo spinal fusion. Preoperative ambulators involved a 7 times higher risk of failure than non-ambulators. Preoperative SINS >7 and fixations spanning junctional regions were associated with SF. Majority of construct failures occurred at the implant-bone interface.

In the Extraordinary Times of Coronavirus Disease 2019: Clinical Strategies for Performing Spinal Surgery.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused pronounced strain on global healthcare systems, forcing the streamlining of clinical activities and conservation of health resources. There is a pressing need for institutions to present discipline-specific strategies for the management of COVID-19 patients. We present the comprehensive considerations at the National University Hospital, Singapore from the surgeon's and anesthetist's perspectives in the performance of spinal surgery in COVID-19 patients. These are based on national guidelines and overarching principles of protection for the healthcare workers (HCWs) and efficiency in surgical planning. The workflow begins with the emergency department screening that has been adapted to the local epidemiology of COVID-19 in order to identify suspected/confirmed cases. If patient history cannot be obtained, demographic, clinical, and imaging data are used. Designated orthopedic "contaminated teams" are available 24/7 with an activation time of <30 minutes for review. In cases where sub-specialty spine surgeons were required, these professionals were inducted into the "contaminated team" and quarantined until cleared to return to work. Indications for emergency spine surgery were determined pre-emptively. Preoperative surgical considerations included the minimization of manpower, limited dissection, reduced operative time, and judicious use of equipment, leading to reduced aerosolization. Anesthesia considerations include preoperative screening for COVID-19-related concerns that influence surgery, operating room process planning and induction, intraoperative, reversal, recovery, and resuscitation considerations. Focused multi-disciplinary preoperative briefing facilitates familiarization. Surgical, anesthetic, and postoperative workflows were designed to reduce the risk of transmission and protect HCWs while effectively performing spinal surgery. The COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated paradigm shifts in healthcare planning, hospital workflows, and operative protocols. The viral burden does not discriminate between surgeons and physicians, and it is crucial that we, as medical professionals, adapt practices to be malleable and fluid to address the ever-changing developments.

A 10-Year Radiographic Study Comparing Anterior Versus Posterior Instrumented Spinal Fusion in Patients With Lenke Type 5 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

MINI: This is a long-term prospective cohort study comparing the radiographic outcomes of anterior versus posterior instrumentation for Lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Both approaches were comparable in terms of radiographic outcomes up to 10 years. The posterior approach is more prone to developing proximal junctional kyphosis. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To compare the long-term, radiographic coronal and sagittal outcomes of these two approaches at 10-year follow-up. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Both anterior and posterior instrumented fusions have been found to be safe and effective treatments for Lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with up to 2 to 5 years of follow-up. Few studies follow patients beyond this duration. METHODS: 36 patients who underwent anterior (n = 25) or posterior instrumented spinal fusion (n = 11) for Lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis over a 4-year period were recruited and followed for 10 years. Preoperative clinical data include patient's age and age of menarche. Operative data included instrumented levels, duration of surgery, and surgical blood loss. Postoperative data included duration of hospital stay, duration of intensive care unit stay, and complications. Pre- and postoperative radiographic data collected include coronal Cobb angles for structural thoracolumbar/lumbar curves, and sagittal angles-sagittal vertical axis, thoracic kyphosis, global lumbar angle, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, and upper and lower end vertebrae. RESULTS: Posterior surgery had a shorter operative time (P < 0.010) and hospital stay (P < 0.010). Coronal plane deformity improved by a mean of 74% in the anterior group and 71% in the posterior group. There was no significant change at 10 years in both groups (anterior P = 0.455 and posterior P = 0.325). Sagittal parameters remained unchanged. There was a higher incidence of proximal junctional kyphosis in the posterior (45%) compared to the anterior (16%) group (P < 0.010). CONCLUSION: Both anterior and posterior instrumentation and fusion are successful surgeries after 10 years of follow-up. They are comparable with regards to their ability to achieve and maintain good correction of scoliotic deformities and have a low rate of pseudoarthrosis and instrument failure. Ideal sagittal parameters are maintained up to 10 years of follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Prospective cohort study. To compare the long-term, radiographic coronal and sagittal outcomes of these two approaches at 10-year follow-up. Both anterior and posterior instrumented fusions have been found to be safe and effective treatments for Lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with up to 2 to 5 years of follow-up. Few studies follow patients beyond this duration. 36 patients who underwent anterior (n = 25) or posterior instrumented spinal fusion (n = 11) for Lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis over a 4-year period were recruited and followed for 10 years. Preoperative clinical data include patient's age and age of menarche. Operative data included instrumented levels, duration of surgery, and surgical blood loss. Postoperative data included duration of hospital stay, duration of intensive care unit stay, and complications. Pre- and postoperative radiographic data collected include coronal Cobb angles for structural thoracolumbar/lumbar curves, and sagittal angles­sagittal vertical axis, thoracic kyphosis, global lumbar angle, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, and upper and lower end vertebrae. Posterior surgery had a shorter operative time (P < 0.010) and hospital stay (P < 0.010). Coronal plane deformity improved by a mean of 74% in the anterior group and 71% in the posterior group. There was no significant change at 10 years in both groups (anterior P = 0.455 and posterior P = 0.325). Sagittal parameters remained unchanged. There was a higher incidence of proximal junctional kyphosis in the posterior (45%) compared to the anterior (16%) group (P < 0.010). Both anterior and posterior instrumentation and fusion are successful surgeries after 10 years of follow-up. They are comparable with regards to their ability to achieve and maintain good correction of scoliotic deformities and have a low rate of pseudoarthrosis and instrument failure. Ideal sagittal parameters are maintained up to 10 years of follow-up. Level of Evidence: 3.

Gustilo IIIB Open Tibial Fractures: An Analysis of Infection and Nonunion Rates.

BACKGROUND: Gustilo IIIB tibial fractures are associated with high rates of infection and nonunion. This study evaluates the impact of factors such as patient demographics, mechanism of injury, time to the first debridement, and time to flap coverage on the union and infection rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on all patients with open tibial fractures who presented to our tertiary trauma center over 13 years from April 2000 to August 2013. All patients were followed for at least 6 months and continued till radiographic evidence of union (maximum 72 months). Time to fracture union was based on radiological evidence of callus bridging at least three cortices. Information on infection rates and the presence of microbes were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients were analyzed. The mean time to fracture union was 33.8 weeks. Younger age was associated with a lower risk of nonunion with the mean age being 30.4 years in union group compared to 38.2 in the delayed-union group. Smoking was associated with an increased risk of delayed union with revision surgery being needed in 61.5% of smokers compared to 36.4% in nonsmokers. Rates of infection were high at 30.3%. Smoking was associated with an increased risk of infection (65.4% vs. 24.7%). CONCLUSION: High-energy open tibia fractures required an average of 8.5 months to heal and delayed or nonunion at an earlier juncture cannot be assumed.

The Predictive Value of Preoperative Health-Related Quality-of-Life Scores on Postoperative Patient-Reported Outcome Scores in Lumbar Spine Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: A single-center, retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To predict patient-reported outcomes (PROs) using preoperative health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) scores by quantifying the correlation between them, so as to aid selection of surgical candidates and preoperative counselling. METHODS: All patients who underwent single-level elective lumbar spine surgery over a 2-year period were divided into 3 diagnosis groups: spondylolisthesis, spinal stenosis, and disc herniation. Patient characteristics and health scores (Oswestry Low Back Pain and Disability Index [ODI], EQ-5D, and Short Form-36 version 2 [SF-36v2]) were collected at 6 and 24 months and compared between the 3 diagnosis groups. Multivariate modelling was performed to investigate the predictive value of each parameter, particularly preoperative ODI and EQ-5D, on postoperative ODI and EQ-5D scores for all the patients. RESULTS: ODI and EQ-5D at 6 and 24 months improved significantly for all patients, especially in the disc herniation group, compared to the baseline. The magnitude of improvement in ODI and EQ-5D was predictable using preoperative ODI, EQ-5D, and SF-36v2 Mental Component Score. At 6 months, 1-point baseline ODI predicts for 0.7-point increase in changed ODI, and a 0.01-point increase in baseline EQ-5D predicts for 0.01-point decrease in changed EQ-5D score. At 24 months, 1-point baseline ODI predicts for 1-point increase in changed ODI, and a 0.01-point increase in baseline EQ-5D predicts for 0.009-point decrease in changed EQ-5D. A younger age is shown to be a positive predictor of ODI at 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: Poorer baseline health scores predict greater improvement in postoperative PROs at 6 and 24 months after the surgery. HRQoL scores can be used to decide on surgery and in preoperative counselling.

Unusual delayed presentation of superior mesenteric artery syndrome following scoliosis correction surgery-a case report and review of literature.

Superior mesenteric artery (SMA) syndrome secondary to extrinsic compression of third part of duodenum is an uncommon complication following scoliosis surgery. It is imperative to diagnose this presentation at an earlier stage as it can be a potentially life threatening complication. If the diagnosis is missed or delayed, the mortality rate can be as high as 33% due to fatal complications like aspiration pneumonia, acute gastric rupture and cardiovascular collapse. We present a 13-year-old patient who was diagnosed with SMA syndrome in the late post-operative period (5.1 weeks) following scoliosis correction surgery. A barium meal and follow-through confirmed the diagnosis of SMA syndrome. She was managed conservatively with which she recovered uneventfully. Such late presentations are very uncommon. In addition, we have also briefly reviewed the pertinent literature. It is essential that we identify high risk patients preoperatively so that we could optimize them with proper intensive dietary supplementation. Postoperatively, a high index of suspicion needs to be retained to identify this syndrome at an early stage so that conservative management may be initiated with good clinical outcome. SMA syndrome can be potentially life threatening when the diagnosis is missed or delayed.

Prevalence and Predictors of Pressure Injuries From Spine Surgery in the Prone Position: Do Body Morphological Changes During Deformity Correction Increase the Risks?

MINI: Pressure injuries are prevalent in patients undergoing spine surgery while prone. Multiple risk factors exist and should be addressed. We found that patients undergoing spinal deformity correction surgery are at unique risk (odds ratio 3.31, P = 0.010) due to body morphological changes occurring secondary to intraoperative changes in spinal alignment. STUDY DESIGN: Review of data and prospective study. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence and predictive factors of pressure injuries in spine surgery performed in the prone position, and to determine whether morphological changes and truncal shifts occurring during deformity correction predispose to this complication. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Spine surgery performed in the prone position presents the risk of developing pressure injuries. This risk is potentially increased in deformity correction, because it tends to involve more extensive procedures, with associated longer operating times. METHODS: Cases of pressure injuries after spine surgery in the prone position were reviewed to ascertain prevalence and determine risk factors. Data including patient factors (age, sex, height, weight, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, comorbidities, Braden scale, neurological status, spinal pathology) and surgical factors (approach, procedure type, number of screws, operated levels, operative time) were collected. Independent risk factors were identified via multivariate analysis. A subsequent prospective analysis of all patients undergoing spinal deformity correction was conducted by performing intraoperative measurements of body morphological changes and shifts in truncal positions. Statistical correlation was performed to determine whether positional shifts cause pressure injuries. RESULTS: The prevalence of pressure injuries was 23.0%. Previous skin problems (P = 0.034), myelopathy (P = 0.013), operative time >300 minutes (P = 0.005), and more than four operated levels (P = 0.006) were independent predictors of pressure injuries. Being a spinal deformity patient was also an independent risk factor for developing pressure injuries (odds ratio 3.31, P = 0.010). Significant changes in body measurements during deformity correction were predictive of pressure injuries. CONCLUSION: Pressure injuries are prevalent in patients undergoing spine surgery while prone. Future studies should investigate strategies to prevent this complication based on the multiple risk factors identified in the present study. Patients undergoing spinal deformity correction surgery are particularly at risk due to intraoperative body morphological changes. Improved padding methods should be trialed in future studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Is Intraoperative Local Vancomycin Powder the Answer to Surgical Site Infections in Spine Surgery?

STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort comparative study of all patients who underwent instrumented spine surgery at a single institution. OBJECTIVE: To compare the rate of surgical site infection (SSI) between the treatment (vancomycin) and the control group (no vancomycin) in patients undergoing instrumented spine surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: SSI after spine surgery is a dreaded complication associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Prophylactic intraoperative local vancomycin powder to the wound has been recently adopted as a strategy to reduce SSI but results have been variable. METHODS: In the present study, there were 117 (30%) patients in the treatment group and 272 (70%) patients in the comparison cohort. All patients received identical standard operative and postoperative care procedures based on protocolized department guidelines. The present study compared the rate of SSI with and without the use of prophylactic intraoperative local vancomycin powder in patients undergoing various instrumented spine surgery, adjusted for confounders. RESULTS: The overall rate of SSI was 4.7% with a decrease in infection rate found in the treatment group (0.9% vs. 6.3%). This was statistically significant (P = 0.049) with an odds ratio of 0.13 (95% confidence interval 0.02-0.99). The treatment group had a significantly shorter onset of infection (5 vs. 16.7 days; P < 0.001) and shorter duration of infection (8.5 vs. 26.8 days; P < 0.001). The most common causative organism was Pseudomonas aeruginosa (35.2%). Patient diagnosis, surgical approach, and intraoperative blood loss were significant risk factors for SSI after multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic Intraoperative local vancomycin powder reduces the risk and morbidity of SSI in patients undergoing instrumented spine surgery. P. aeruginosa infection is common in the treatment arm. Future prospective randomized controlled trials in larger populations involving other spine surgeries with a long-term follow-up duration are recommended. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Reproducibility of sagittal radiographic parameters in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis-a guide to reference values using serial imaging.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Knowledge of sagittal radiographic parameters in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients has not yet caught up with our understanding of their roles in patients with adult spinal deformity. It is likely that more emphasis will be placed in restoring sagittal parameters for AIS patients in the future. Therefore, we need to understand how these parameters may vary in AIS to facilitate management plans. PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the reproducibility of sagittal spinal parameters on lateral film radiographs in patients with AIS. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This was a retrospective, comparative study conducted in a tertiary health-care institution from January 2013 to February 2016 (3-year period). PATIENT SAMPLE: All AIS patients who underwent deformity correction surgery from January 2013 to February 2016 and had two preoperative serial lateral radiographs taken within the time period of a month were included in the study. OUTCOME MEASURES: Radiographic sagittal spinal parameters including sagittal vertical axis (SVA), cervical lordosis (CL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), thoracolumbar alignment (TL), lumbar lordosis (LL); standard spinopelvic measurements such as pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS); as well as end and apical vertebrae of cervical, thoracic, and lumbar curves were the outcome measures. METHODS: All patient data were pooled from electronic medical records, and X-ray images were retrieved from Centricity Enterprise Web. Averaged X-ray measurements by two independent assessors were analyzed by comparing two radiographs of the same patients performed within a 1-month time period. Chi-squared and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used for categorical and continuous variables. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 138 patients, 28 men and 110 women, with a mean age of 15 years (range 11-20). Between the two lateral X-rays, there was a mean difference of 0.79 cm in SVA (p<.001), 0.70° in LL (p=.033), and 0.73° in PT (p=.010). In the combined Lenke 1 and 2 subgroup, there was a similar 0.77 cm (p=.002), 0.79° (p=.009), and 1.49° (p=.001) mean difference in SVA, LL, and PT, respectively. Additionally, there was also a 1.85° (p=.009) and 1.76° (p=.006) mean difference seen in TL and SS, respectively. The overall profile of the sagittal curves remained largely similar, with only the lumbar apex shifting from L3 to L4 during the first and the second X-rays, respectively (p<.001). This occurred for the combined Lenke 1 and 2 subgroup as well (p<.001). CONCLUSION: Most radiographic sagittal spinal parameters in AIS patients are generally reproducible with some variations up to a maximum of 4°. This natural variation should be taken into account when interpreting these radiographic sagittal parameters so as to achieve the most accurate results in surgical planning.

Spinal Implants Can Be Inserted in Patients With Deep Spine Infection: Results From a Large Cohort Study.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective, cohort study of 84 patients with deep spine infection managed at a major tertiary hospital over 14 years with a minimum follow up of 2 years. OBJECTIVE: To determine the role of instrumentation in spines with deep infection. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: It is often believed that implants should not be inserted in patients with deep spine infection because of the risk of persistent or recurrent infection. However, there are often concerns about spinal stability and a paucity of evidence to guide clinical practice in this field. METHODS: We compared the mortality, reoperation, and reinfection rates in patients with spine infection treated with antibiotics alone, antibiotics with debridement, and antibiotics with debridement and instrumentation. Significant outcome predictors were determined using multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS: Forty-nine males and 35 females with a mean age was 62.0 years had spine infection affecting the lumbar spine predominantly. The most common form of infection was osteomyelitis and spondylodiscitis (69.4%). Staphylococcus aureus was the most common causative organism (61.2%).There was no difference in terms of reoperation or relapse for patients treated with antibiotics alone, antibiotics with debridement, or antibiotics with debridement and instrumentation. However, compared with antibiotics alone, the crude inhospital mortality was lower for patients treated with instrumentation (odds ratio, OR, 0.82; P = 0.01), and antibiotics with debridement (OR 0.80; P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Spinal instrumentation in an infected spine is safe and not associated with higher reoperation or relapse rates. Mortality is lower for patients treated with instrumentation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Metastatic Spine Tumor Surgery: A Comparative Study of Minimally Invasive Approach Using Percutaneous Pedicle Screws Fixation Versus Open Approach.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Minimally invasive spinal surgery (MISS) has been gaining recognition in patients with metastatic spine disease (MSD). The advantages are reduction in blood loss, hospital stay, and postoperative morbidity. Most of the studies were case series with very few comparing the outcomes of MISS to open approaches. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the clinical and perioperative outcomes of MISS versus open approach in patients with symptomatic MSD, who underwent posterior spinal stabilization and/or decompression. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our study included 45 MSD patients; 27 managed by MISS and 18 by open approach. All patients had MSD presenting with symptoms of neurological deficit, spinal instability, or both. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were collected for comparison of the 2 approaches. All patients were followed up until the end of study period (maximum up to 4 years from time of surgery) or till their demise. The clinical outcome measures were pain control, neurological and functional status, whereas perioperative outcomes were blood loss, operative time, length of hospital stay, and time taken to initiate radiotherapy/chemotherapy after index surgery. RESULTS: Majority of patients in both groups showed improvement in pain, neurological status, independent ambulation, and ECOG score in the postoperative period with no significant differences between the 2 groups. There was a significant reduction in intraoperative blood loss (621 mL less, P<0.001) in the MISS group. The average time to initiate radiotherapy after surgery was 13 days (range, 12-16 d) in MISS and 24 days (range, 16-40 d) in the open group. This difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). Operative time and duration of hospital stay were also favorable in the MISS group, although the differences were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: MISS is comparable with open approach demonstrating similar improvements in clinical outcomes, that is pain control, neurological and functional status. MISS approaches have also shown promising results due to lesser intraoperative blood loss and allowing earlier radiotherapy/chemotherapy.

Radiographical definition of the proximal tibiofibular joint - A cross-sectional study of 2984 knees and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Proximal tibiofibular joint (PTFJ) injuries are not uncommon but relatively understudied. This study evaluates the effectiveness of 2 radiographic methods in assessing the integrity of the PTFJ. STUDY DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional study of 2984 consecutive patients with knee X-rays done in a single institution over a 4-month period. A total of 5968 knee X-rays were assessed using 2 methods-[1] The direction in which the fibula points to in relation to the lateral femoral epicondyle on anteroposterior view and Blumensaat line on lateral view. [2] The degree of tibiofibular overlap as percentage of widest portion of the fibula head. Sensitivity and specificity of these methods in diagnosing a disrupted PTFJ are calculated. Variables including quality of X-rays, weight-bearing status of AP views and degree of knee flexion on lateral views are also recorded. Univariate analysis was carried out to investigate the association between variables using chi-square test for nominal data and student t-test for continuous data. RESULTS: The fibular points towards the lateral femoral epicondyle on AP view in 94.4% of the patients and points towards the posterior half of the Blumensaat line on lateral view in 98.1% of the patients. Using this method, weight-bearing X-rays are significantly associated with the direction the fibula is pointing (p<0.01) on the AP view and the degree of knee flexion is associated with the direction the fibula is pointing (p<0.01) on the lateral view. The AP tibiofibular overlap ranges from >0% to <75% in 94.1% of the patients and the lateral tibiofibular overlap ranges from >0% to <75% in 84.5% of the patients. This method is associated with whether true orthogonal X-rays of the knees are taken (p=0.048). CONCLUSION: The direction in which the fibula is pointing and the percentage of tibiofibular overlap are highly specific radiographic methods useful in defining the PTFJ. The first method requires a weight-bearing view on AP assessment and >20 degrees of flexion on lateral assessment. True orthogonal AP and lateral views are required for the second method to be used.

Reamer Irrigator Aspirator bone graft harvesting: complications and outcomes in an Asian population.

INTRODUCTION: Autologous bone grafting has been accepted as the gold standard in the treatment of non-unions and in definitive filling of segmental bone defects. However, there have been well-recognised complications associated with their harvest. The Reamer Irrigator Aspirator (RIA) system is an alternative technique of autologous bone graft harvesting. Studies have been published in the Western population showing the efficacy and outcome of this technique. No prior studies were done in the Asian population, who has smaller average canals, different femoral geometry as compared to Caucasians and weaker bone density in both genders. We aim to present the findings and discuss its suitability in the Asian population when dealing with segmental bone loss and non-unions requiring reconstruction. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of all trauma patients with segmental bone loss and non-unions treated with RIA bone grafting over a 4.5 year period. A total of 57 cases of RIA bone grafting were conducted on 53 patients. The amount of bone graft harvested, blood loss and post-operative pain were measured. Patients were followed up for union rate as well as complications of the procedure. RESULTS: Union was achieved in 86.8% of patients. The mean time to union was 17.64 weeks. Seven patients did not achieve union after the first RIA surgery, in which six of seven were open fractures initially and six were smokers. One major intra-operative complication was recorded, that being a fractured femoral shaft due to thinning of the cortex by the RIA harvester. There were two patients who developed donor site superficial soft tissue infection that resolved after a course of antibiotics. There were no long-term complications seen in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: The safety and efficacy of RIA bone graft harvesting for the management of non-union in the Asian population is promising, with adequate graft quantities, high success and low complication rates that are comparable to the Caucasian population. The diameter of the medullary canal in our population is suitable for this procedure. We believe that RIA bone graft harvesting provides a reliable and safe alternative source of autologous bone grafts for bone grafting of non-union sites.

Clinical outcomes of single-level lumbar artificial disc replacement compared with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in an Asian population.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to examine the clinical outcome of single-level lumbar artificial disc replacement (ADR) compared to that of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for the treatment of symptomatic degenerative disc disease (DDD) in an Asian population. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 74 patients who had surgery performed for discogenic lower backs that involved only the L4/5 and L5/S1 levels. All the patients had lumbar DDD without radiculopathy or spondylolithesis, and concordant pain with discogram at the pathological level. The patients were divided into two groups--those who underwent ADR and those who underwent TLIF. RESULTS: A trend suggesting that the ADR group had better perioperative outcomes (less blood loss, shorter operating time, shorter hospital stay and shorter time to ambulation) than the TLIF group was observed. However, a trend indicating that surgical-approach-related complications occurred more frequently in the ADR group than the TLIF group was also observed. The rate of revision surgery was comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that for the treatment of discogenic lower back pain, lumbar ADR has better perioperative outcomes and a similar revision rate when compared with TLIF. However, the use of ADR was associated with a higher incidence of surgical-approach-related complications. More studies with bigger cohort sizes and longer follow-up periods are needed to determine the long-term efficacy and safety of ADR in lumbar DDD.